Registration via LPIS
| Day | Date | Time | Room |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wednesday | 10/10/12 | 04:00 PM - 07:00 PM | SR Inst. Wirtschafts-u. Sozialgeschichte |
| Wednesday | 10/24/12 | 04:00 PM - 07:00 PM | SR Inst. Wirtschafts-u. Sozialgeschichte |
| Wednesday | 11/07/12 | 04:00 PM - 07:00 PM | SR Inst. Wirtschafts-u. Sozialgeschichte |
| Wednesday | 11/21/12 | 04:00 PM - 07:00 PM | SR Inst. Wirtschafts-u. Sozialgeschichte |
| Wednesday | 12/05/12 | 04:00 PM - 07:00 PM | SR Inst. Wirtschafts-u. Sozialgeschichte |
| Wednesday | 12/19/12 | 04:00 PM - 07:00 PM | SR Inst. Wirtschafts-u. Sozialgeschichte |
| Wednesday | 01/09/13 | 04:00 PM - 07:00 PM | SR Inst. Wirtschafts-u. Sozialgeschichte |
| Wednesday | 01/23/13 | 04:00 PM - 07:00 PM | SR Inst. Wirtschafts-u. Sozialgeschichte |
This course examines classical and contemporary theories of justice, by comparing and critically analyzing the principles developed to guide the distribution of wealth, rights, power, and opportunities in a society. We will thereby especially focus (a) on the idea of a conceptual relationships between “justice and” “equality”, presupposed or rejected in classical political philosophy (Locke, Kant), and (b) on the recently raised “equality of what” (Sen) question. Thus the last part of this course will discuss contemporary egalitarian, libertarian and welfare principles of distributive justice (Rawls, Williams, Nozick, Dworkin).
Questions: What is justice? Justice and the idea of a state of nature (Locke). What could count as expression of freedom? Property and Rights (Locke, Hume, Smith). Why “freedom” is not just a logically negative concept” – freedom and duty (Kant). What is a just distribution – or “equality of what? “Equality” and “justice” (Rawls, Williams). The debate between egalitarianism and libertarianisms (Rawls , Williams, Nozick, Dworkin). What are “well being” principles of justice? (Sen).
(ii) apply fundamental concepts used in debates on distributive justice,
a. of distributive justice
(iii) evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of contemporary moral philosophy
(iv) argue for the limitations of a purely formal understanding of ‘equality’
(v) they will be able to analyze the application of ‘tools’ drawn from the discussed principles to concrete cases
20% 1short midterm exam (30 minutes)
30% contribution in class and on Learn WU
30% final paper
Response papers will be answerable at home, (10 – 15 questions distributed at the end of the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5 ) the midterm (on the second Saturday) and the final exam (in the last week) will be held in-class, the final paper will have explore one of the principles of distributive justice