A) Der Beginn der Debatte zu "Transzendentalen Argumenten"

Die Konferenz 1977 in Bielefeld.

Grundliteratur:

• Bieri, P., Horstmann, R.-P. & Krüger, L. (eds.): "The Structure and Function of Transcendental Arguments; The Significance of Skepticism". In: Transcendental Arguments and Science: Essays in Epistemology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing 1979, p. 1-113, p. 277-300.
• Ambrose, E.: "The Philosophy of G. E. Moore. Moore's 'Proof on an External World'". In: Schilpp, P. A. (ed.): The Library of Living Philosophers. Volume IV. La Salle: Open Court 1887, p. 397-417. 
• Stroud B.: "The Significance of Skepticism". In: Bieri, P., Horstmann, R.-P. & Krüger, L. (eds.): Transcendental Arguments and Science: Essays in Epistemology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing 1979, p. 277-300.

Zusatzliteratur:

• Bardon, A.: "Transcendental Arguments". In: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy,  http://www.iep.utm.edu/trans-ar/ (02.10.2016).
• Stern, R.: "Transcendental Arguments". In: Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/transcendental-arguments/ (02.10.2016).
• Pereboom, D.: "Kant's Transcendental Arguments". In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-transcendental/ (02.10.2016).
• Bieri, P.: "Transcendental Arguments and Science". In: The Journal of Philosophy, 79, 1982.
• Stapleford, S.: "Kant's Transcendental Arguments: Disciplining Pure Reason". In: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews,  http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/23978-kant-s-transcendental-arguments-disciplining-pure-reason/ (15.9.2016).

B) Modus ponens oder modus tollens?

Zur Struktur und Gültigkeit der Argumentation.

Grundliteratur:

• Austin, J.: "Are There A Priori Concepts?". In: Philosophical Papers.  Chap. 2, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 1961, p. 32-54.
• Lange, H.: "Der Begriff einer analytischen Rekonstruktion von Kants Metaphysik der Erfahrung". In: Kants modus ponens: Überlegungen und Vorschläge zu einer analytischen Rekonstruktion von Kants Metaphysik der Erfahrung. Würzburg: Dr. Johannes Königshausen + Dr. Thomas Neumann 1988, p. 14-31.
• Mourad, R.: "A Definition of "Transcendental Argument". Objections to two types of Necessary Conditions". In: Transcendental Arguments and Justified Christian Belief. Lanham: University Press of America 2005, Chap. 1.III and Chap. 3.III, p. 29-38, p. 93-106.
• Allision, H. E.: "The A-Deduction: Section 2". In: Kant´s Transcendental Deduction An Analytical-Historical Commentary. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press 2015, p. 197-205.
• Longuenesse, B.: "Judgments of Perception and Judgments of Experience in the Logic: Uncriticised Objectifications to their Corrections". In: Kant and the Capacity to Judge Sensibility and Discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the critique of pure reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press, p. 188-197.

C) Barry Stroud und Transzendentale Argumente

Grundliteratur:

• Stroud, B.: "Transcendental Arguments". In: Understanding Human Knowledge: Philosophical Essays. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 2000, p. 9-25.
• Stroud, B.: "Internal and External: Empirical and Transcendental". In: The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 1984, Chap. 4, p. 128-169.
• Stroud, B.: "Necessity". In: Engagement and Metaphysical Dissatisfaction Modality and Value. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, p. 59- 89.
• Stroud, B.: "The Goal of Transcendental Arguments". In: Understanding Human Knowledge Philosophical Essays. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 2000, p. 203-223.
• Grundmann, T.: "Was ist eigentlich ein transzendentales Argument?". In: Heidemann, D. & Engelhard, K. (eds.): Warum Kant heute? Bedeutung und Relevanz seiner Philosophie in der Gegenwart, Berlin: Walter De Gruyter 2003, p. 44-75.
• Grundmann, T. & Misselhorn, C.: "Transcendental Arguments and Realism". In: Glock, H.-J. (ed.), Strawson and Kant. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 2003, p. 205-218.

D) Philosophie des Skeptizismus

Grundliteratur:

• Stroud, B.: "Causality and the Inference from the Observed to the Unobserved: The Negative Phase". In: Hume. Chap. III, London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1977, p. 42-67.
  
• Stapleford, S.: "Transcendental Arguments, Transcendental Idealism and the Framework Principle. The Argument in the Refutation of Idealism". In: Kant´s Transcendental Arguments Disciplining Pure Reason, London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group 2008, p. 30-40, p. 80-100.
  
• Benton, R.: "The Problem of Transcendental Arguments and the Second Critique as test case". In: Kant´s second critique and the Problem of Transcendental Arguments, Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff 1977, p. 1-67.
  
• Stern, R.: "Kant´s response to skepticism". In: Greco, J. (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism, Chap. 12, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 2008, p. 266-285.
  
• Stern, R.: "Transcendental Arguments: Objections". In: Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism Answering the Question of Justification. Chap. 2, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 2006, p. 43-65.

E) Kritik an der Kritik an "Transzendentalen Argumenten"

Grundliteratur:

• Coliva, A.: "Wittgenstein: Doubts and the Nonsense of Skepticism". In: Moore and Wittgenstein: Scepticism, Certainty and Common Sense. Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan 2010, p. 103-148.
  
• Stroud, B.: "Evolution and the Necessities of Thought". In: Meaning, Understanding, and Practice, Chap. 4, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 2000, p. 52-66.
  
• Longuenesse, B.: "Kant´s Deconstruction of the Principle of Sufficient Reason". In: The Harvard Review of Philosophy, IX 2001, p. 67-87.
  
• Franks, P. W.: "Post-Kantian Transcendental Arguments". In: All or Nothing Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. London: Harvard University Press 2005, p. 201-259.
  
• Hookway, C.: "Modest Transcendental Arguments and Sceptical Doubts: A Reply to Stroud". In: Stern, R. (ed.): Transcendental Arguments Problems and Prospects, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 1999, p. 173-187.

F) Transzendentale Argumente und das Objekt der Wahrnehmung

Grundliteratur:

• Stroud, B.: "Perceptual Knowledge and Epistemological Satisfaction". In: Philosophers Past and Present, Chap. 17, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, p. 322-334.
  
• Searle, J.R.: Seeing Things as They Are. A Theory of Perception, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 2015.

G) Transzendentale Argumente und Moralphilosophie

Grundliteratur:

• Tugendhat, E.: "Kants Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten: der 1. Abschnitt und 2. Abschnitt". In: Vorlesungen über Ethik (6. & 7. Vorlesung), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1993, p. 98-160.