Syllabus

Title
2274 Environmental Change and Policy II
Instructors
Univ.Prof. Mag.Dr. Sigrid Stagl, M.S., Dr. Martin Bruckner, PD Dipl.-Vw.Dr. Reinhard Mechler
Type
PI
Weekly hours
4
Language of instruction
Englisch
Registration
09/06/16 to 09/30/16
Registration via LPIS
Notes to the course
Subject(s) Master Programs
Dates
Day Date Time Room
Thursday 10/06/16 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 10/13/16 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 10/20/16 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 10/27/16 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 11/03/16 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 11/10/16 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 11/17/16 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 11/24/16 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Friday 11/25/16 11:30 AM - 01:30 PM EA.5.030
Thursday 12/01/16 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 12/15/16 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 12/22/16 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 01/12/17 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 01/19/17 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 01/26/17 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM D5.1.002
Thursday 02/02/17 08:00 AM - 12:30 PM D5.1.002
Contents

The course introduces and critically examines some of the most widely used methodologies, methods and models for informing environmental policy and implementation across scales. By focussing on the nexus between methods and policy and practice, we assess critically how decision-support for socio-ecological problems may be effective. We draw connections to the underlying philosophy behind methodologies and methods including their ontological and epistemological foundations.

Learning outcomes

•    Understand the nexus between theories, models, methods and policies

•    Understand and apply some of the most widely used methods and modelling frameworks for the analysis of environmental change

•    Improved ability to critically evaluate methods and develop an ability to judge why some methods are more suitable than others for socio-ecological economic analysis

•    Understand how ecological economic analyses can input into decision making processes in different contexts

•    Attain a higher level of understanding about the workings of climate governance structures and public policy instruments

•    Develop an ability to analyse strengths and weaknesses of existing environmental governance structures

•    Understand different framings in the science-policy interface and develop ideas for alternative approaches

•    As one focus area, be aware of different perspectives taken on the green economy discourse incl. implicit and explicit assumptions


Teaching/learning method(s)

•    Lecture-style input (in-class as well as lecturecast)

•    Group exercises

•    Individual hands-on exercises

•    Group debate

•    Journal and guiding questions

•    Practice clinics


Assessment

Formal grading (summative assessment) will occur through a joint paper (take-home), two short individual academically-oriented papers and your contribution to a common good (wiki); formative assessment will take place throughout as well. Grades are broken down as follows:

•    Group paper “Growth” 30%; due: 3 Nov 2016 9am

•    Individual paper 1 “Physical Accounting“ 30%; due: 24 Nov 2016 9am

•    Individual paper 2 “Systems Modelling“ 30%; due: 19 Jan 2017 9am

•    Class Wiki “Science-Society Interface” 10%; due: 12 Feb 2017 midnight

These are strict deadlines! Submissions within 24 hours after the deadline will be accepted with a mark-down of 25% of points. Thereafter we will not accept any submissions. No exceptions.

All submissions via assignment section at Learn@WU.

For the Class Wiki “Science-Society Interface” 50% of the grade (=5% of your overall grade) will be based on the quality of the output and a further 50% of the grade (=5% of your overall grade) will be based on a brief report on the group process and distribution of tasks.


Prerequisites for participation and waiting lists

Prerequisites for Incoming Exchange Students nominated by WU partner universities:

Minimum requirements to attend this course:

•    Economics (accumulated minimum of 16 ECTS credits) OR

•    Social sciences (accumulated minimum of 16 ECTS credits) OR

•    Mathematics / statistics / quantitative methods (accumulated minimum of 16 ECTS credits)

Proficiency in English is required. If you do not meet this requirement, we reserve the right to withdraw students from the course.


Other

Rough guidance on the time that you are expected to allocate to this course

10 ECTS = 250 hours of work (60 minutes each)

The elements of this course were designed with the following timings in mind.

Class attendance (15 classes, 3 hours each)                             45 hours

Weekly reading incl. journal writing (15 weeks, 3 hours each)    45 hours

Group paper “Growth” (30% of your grade)                                 48 hours

Individual paper 1 “Physical Accounting“ (30% of your grade)    48 hours

Individual paper 2 “Systems Modelling“ (30% of your grade)      48 hours

Class Wiki “Science-Society Interface” (10% of your grade)       16 hours

Total    250 hours

Obviously, these timings are merely rough estimates and may vary considerably between individuals (e.g. due to differences in prior knowledge, speed reading skills).


Classroom etiquette

Be on time. Walking in late disturbs everyone. At this university and many places of employment, tardiness communicates lack of interest and lack of dependability. If you cannot avoid being late, make sure to be unobtrusive about your entry.

Please turn off and do not use mobile communication devices in class, you should be paying attention to the lecturer and class discussions, not communicating externally. Occasionally we will ask you to bring your laptop to class for some of the exercises. Also during these periods, we ask you to concentrate on the exercise and not communicate externally.

While it is acceptable – and for health reasons recommended – to bring your filled water bottle to class, we ask you to wait for the break or the end of class to refill it. Getting up and walking out during a session disturbs people and gives the impression that you don’t respect the class, the other students or the instructors.

If you must miss a class, contact Mr. Bruckner ahead of time to let him know that you will not be in class.

Do not dominate other students’ opportunities to learn by asking too many questions. It’s good to ask questions and make comments, but keep them related to the discussion at hand and allow also for space for others.

Unit details
Unit Date Contents
1 06.10.2016

1. From concepts and, theories to methods and models: pluralistic methodologies and multiple lines of evidence for informing sustainability transitions across science-society

•    Introductions and organisational matters

•    Understanding the nexus between theory and concepts, methods and models

•    Exploring the link between EC&P I and EC&P II

•    Planning collective work on Wiki

Reading

Dow, S.C., 2007. Variety of methodological approach in economics. Journal of Economic Surveys 21, 447-465.

Turnheim,B., Berkhout, F., Geels, F., Hof, A., McMeekin, A., Nykviste, B., van Vuuren, D. (2105). Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges. Global Environmental Change 35: 239–253

  • Starting Wiki


2 13.10.2016

2. Introduction and presentation: Science – Policy - Society Interface I

  • How to effectively constitute the science-policy- society interface?

Reading

van den Hove, S. (2007). A rationale for science–policy interfaces. Futures 39. 807–826

McNie, E. (2007). Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environmental science & policy 10, 17–38

Additional Reading

Hodgson, G. M. (2006). "What Are Institutions?" Journal of Economic Issues XL(1).

Stagl, S. (2012). Value articulating institutions and changing social preferences. Reflexive governance for global public goods. T. D. Eric Brousseau, Bernd Siebenhüner. Cambridge, MIT Press.


3 20.10.2016

3. Green Growth, A-Growth & Degrowth: Methodological Approach

•    What is the role of economic growth in a socio-ecological transformation?

•    What relationship between economic growth and relevant socio-ecological variables can we observe?

•    How do these changes in the past compare to what is required for the future?

Reading

van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. 2011 'Environment versus growth — A criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for “a-growth”', Ecological Economics 70(5): 881-890.

Revisit readings from EC&P I:

Kallis, G., 2011. In defence of degrowth. Ecol. Econ. 70, 873-880.

Demaria, F., Schneider, F., Sekulova, F., & Martinez-Alier, J. 2013. What is degrowth? from an activist slogan to a social movement. Environmental Values, 22(2), 191–215.

Additional Reading

Stern, D. I. and Common, M. S. 2001 'Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur?', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41(2): 162-178.

Rothman, D. S. 1998 'Environmental Kuznets curves - real progress or passing the buck? A case for consumption-based approaches', Ecological Economics 25(2): 177-194.


4 27.10.2016

4. Green Growth, A-Growth, Degrowth: Application (statistical analysis) (Laptop)

Exploring growth, emission and resource use paths in Europe

Reading:

Mechler, R., Rezai, A., Stagl, S. (2010). Is Green Growth feasible? Some reflections and implications for Austria. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter (4): 451-465

  • Clinic Fri 28 November 2016, 9-11:30am
  • Group paper due Thu 3 November 2016, 9am


5 03.11.2016

5. Bottom-up scenario development – Methodological Approach & Application - Introduction to scenario development

1- Lecturecast (two 15-minute videos)

2- Reading on Scenario Building (40 min)

Amer, Muhammad, Tugrul U. Daim, and Antonie Jetter."A review of scenario planning." Futures 46 (2013): 23-40.

3- Reading on car-free city concept (30 min)

“End of the car age:  how cities are outgrowingthe automobile”, Stephen Moss, Tuesday 28 April 2015

6 10.11.2016

6. Environmental Accounting and Social Metabolism incl. Input-Output Analysis: Methodological Approach (Laptop)

  • How to holistically account for environmental impacts of production and consumption choices?
  • How to effectively use metrics and communicate results?

Reading

Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Weisz, H., Winiwarter, V., 2004. Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy 21, 199–213.

Tukker, A., Bulavskaya, T., Giljum, S., de Koning, A., Lutter, S., Simas, M., Stadler, K., Wood, R., 2014. The Global Resource Footprint of Nations. Carbon, water, land and materials embodied in trade and final consumption, Leiden/Delft/Vienna/Trondheim.

Hoekstra, A.Y. and Wiedmann, T.O., 2014. Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint. Science 344, 1114–1117.

Additional Reading

Bruckner, M., Giljum, S., Lutz, C., Wiebe, K.S., 2012. Materials embodied in international trade – Global material extraction and consumption between 1995 and 2005. Global Environmental Change 22(3), 568–576.

7 17.11.2016

7. Environmental Accounting and Social Metabolism incl. Input-Output Analysis: Application (Laptop)

  • Clinic on Fri, 18 Nov 2016, 9:30-12:00am
  • Individual paper due 24 November 2016, 9am


8 24.11.2016

8. Multi-Criteria Analysis: Methodological Approach (Laptop)

  • How can we support decision-making when multiple criteria need to be taken into consideration?
  • What do the different elements of the technical analysis mean?
  • How and why might we consider ‘broadening out’ the scope of what appraisal methods take into account and ‘opening up’ the effects they have on the political policy processes to which they relate?

Reading

Stagl, S. (2007). Emerging Methods for Sustainability Valuation and Appraisal - SDRN Rapid Research and Evidence Review, London, Sustainable Development Research Network: 92. http://www.sd-research.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/Emerging%20Methods%20for%20Sustainability%20Valuation%20and%20Appraisal_0.pdf

Stagl, S. (2006). "Multicriteria evaluation and public participation: The case of UK energy policy." Land Use Policy 23(1): 53-62.

Stirling, A. (2008). "’Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology." Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2): 262-294.


9 01.12.2016

9. Multi-Criteria Analysis: Application (Laptop)

10 15.12.2016

10. Systems analysis for policy: Methodological Approach (Laptop)

  • What is systems analysis
  • How is it part of Integrated Assessment Approaches ?
  • Why do we need Systems Analysis for informing policy?
  • Has Systems Analysis been effective in informing policy?

Reading

Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J. & William W. Behrens III (1972). The Limits to Growth. Universe Books

Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J. (2004). Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update, Chelsea Green.


11 22.12.2016

11. Systems analysis for policy: Application (Laptop)

Own application using STELLA or VENSIM

  • Supported by online discussion forum
  • Individual paper due 12 Jan 2017, 9am


12 12.01.2017

12. Pluralistic methodologies and multiple lines of evidence for informing sustainability transitions across science-society

Reviewing wiki-progress & planning final steps


13 19.01.2017

13. Climate-related Integrated Assessment Modelling and scenario development

  • What are building blocks of integrated assessment modelling?
  • What is the balance between data and theory-driven approaches?
  • How to account for key drivers of change?

Reading

IPCC (2000). Emission Scenarios. Summary for Policymakers. A special report by WG III. IPCC, Geneva.

Additional Reading

Kok, K., Patel, M., Rothman, D., Quaranta (2006). Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part II. Participatory local scenario development. Futures 38 (3): 285–311

Rotmans, J. and Van Asselt, M. (1999). Integrated assessment modelling. In: Martens, P. and Rotmans, J. (eds). Climate change: an integrated perspective. Advances in Global Change Research no. 1. Springer, Heidelberg: 239-275


14 26.01.2017

14. Science-Policy II: Understanding and communicating climate change - the IPCC story and beyond

  • How to set up a boundary institution and build credibility?
  • What are key boundary objects for informing climate policy?
  • How to communicate uncertainty?

Reading

IPCC (2014). Synthesis 5th Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press (forthcoming)

Mastrandrea, M.D., C.B. Field, T.F. Stocker, O. Edenhofer, K.L. Ebi, D.J. Frame, H. Held, E. Kriegler, K.J. Mach, P.R. Matschoss, G.-K. Plattner, G.W. Yohe, and F.W. Zwiers (2010). Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Smith JB, Schneider SH, Oppenheimer M, Yohe GW, Hare W, Mastrandrea MD, Patwardhan A, Burton I, Corfee-Morlot J, Magadza CHD, Füssel H-M, Pittock AB, Rahman A, Suarez A, van Ypersele J-P (2009). Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) "reasons for concern." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(11):4133–4137

Additional reading

Watson, R. (2005). Turning science into policy: challenges and experiences from the science–policy interface. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 471–477


15 02.02.2017

15. What are quality criteria for high quality empirical ecological economic analyses?

Student led debate where all students will be expected to participate in different ways (e.g. develop positions, engage with opponents, question from the floor).

Synthesis and feedback


Last edited: 2016-10-07



Back