Syllabus

Title
5671 Logic and Methodology of Social Sciences
Instructors
Dr. Stefan Josko Riegelnik, ao.Univ.Prof. Dr. Gabriele Mras
Type
VUE
Weekly hours
2
Language of instruction
Englisch
Registration
02/23/21 to 02/25/21
Registration via LPIS
Notes to the course
Subject(s) Bachelor Programs
Dates
Day Date Time Room
Tuesday 03/09/21 12:00 PM - 02:30 PM Online-Einheit
Tuesday 03/16/21 12:00 PM - 02:30 PM Online-Einheit
Tuesday 03/23/21 12:00 PM - 02:30 PM Online-Einheit
Tuesday 04/13/21 12:00 PM - 02:30 PM Online-Einheit
Tuesday 04/20/21 12:00 PM - 02:30 PM Online-Einheit
Friday 04/23/21 04:00 PM - 08:00 PM Online-Einheit
Wednesday 04/28/21 01:30 PM - 02:00 PM Online-Einheit
Tuesday 05/11/21 12:30 PM - 03:00 PM Online-Einheit
Tuesday 05/18/21 12:30 PM - 03:00 PM Online-Einheit
Tuesday 05/25/21 12:30 PM - 03:00 PM Online-Einheit
Contents

This is an introductory course into the philosophy of science and the philosophy of the social sciences. It deals with questions concerning the aims of scientific inquiries, the differences between science and non-science, the potential validity of reasoning based on empirical data in distinction to deductive reasoning, and the presuppositions of all empirical inquiries.

The questions we will pursue are (i) questions in the philosophy of science and the history of the philosophy of science, (ii) epistemological and (iii) metaphysical or ontological questions.

        In order to answer these questions we will look into the beginning of philosophical reasoning from Antiquity to the Middle Ages to the “Scientific Revolution”. What are early views of “demonstration” of empirical investigations (Aristotle, Francis Bacon)? We will then focus on the scepticism concerning the foundations of such methods (David Hume), and Immanuel Kant's dissolution of these doubts in his „Copernican Turn“. Toward the end of this course we’ll have a brief look into the rise of the idea of “social sciences” in the 19th century  (J. St. Mill, William Whewell, Auguste Comte) and the development of a "new mathematical" logic by Gottlob Frege and George Boole. Then we will focus on the most influential methodological views in the 20th century based on this "mathematical" logic: Logical Empiricism and Critical Rationalism and Critical Theory. 

(Part A) the philosophy of science - part, i.e. the lecture part of this course consists in 5 lectures: 

“1. Scientific Reasoning in Antiquity”: 9. March 2021

“2. Scholasticism and the Scientific Revolution ...”: 16. March 2021

“3. The Presuppositions of all Empirical Observation”: 23. March 2021

EASTER BREAK 

“4. 'Social Science' – and the development of a “new”, mathematical logic”: 13. April 2021

“5. Theories of confirmation in the 20th century: 20. April 2021: This is the last lecture, the last session before the Q&A session and the final exam of part A  (part A: no attendance requirement, no synchron lectures). 

Q&A-Sessions: 23. April 2021 

MC EXAM: 28. April 2021 (a Wednesday!)

(Part B) The philosophy of the social sciences - part  (11.5., 18.5., 25.5.): 100% attendance requirement

We will discuss and apply the various methods of scientific reasoning (studied before) onto questions in the social sciences. 

 

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes in general:

(i) to develop an appreciation for the scientific enterprise as such, to become familiar with the history of methodological thinking, (ii) to develop the deductive and analytical skills needed in scientific reasoning to enhance the ability to approach questions in the empirical sciences by raising questions about the adequate methods, (iii) to gain knowledge of the debates about the potential difference between natural and social sciences

The learning outcomes in particular of part (A) are:

(i) to gain knowledge on the history of methodological thinking, (ii) to construe premises and valid conclusions in deductive syllogistic arguments, (iii) to be able to identify the specific character of inductive arguments, (iv) to understand the limitations concerning the possibility of justifying the results of empirical inquiries (v) to apply various methods of empirical reasoning in the light of these limitations

in part (B):  (vi) to understand the difference in the ontological status of the social sciences, (vii) to become familiar with various views about the goal of the social sciences.

Attendance requirements

This is a course that is divided into a lecture part (part A) and a “Uebung” (part B), i.e., a part, in which we will apply the general consideration in respect to questions about the status of the so called „social sciences“. 

For the lecture-part (part A) of this course NO attendance is required. The lecture- sessions will be held synchron. The last of the 5 lectures in part (A) is on the 20th of April. The last session in part A on Friday the 23rd is a Q&A session.

Between Part (A) and Part (B) the MC exam will take place: on the 28th of April 2021.

The “Uebungs”-part (part B, i.e. 3 last sessions) will require 100% attendance — online attendance is required in the synchron sessions and attendance will be checked.

Part B = sessions on the 11.5., 18.5., 25.5. For more information about the lecture part (A) and the UE part  B) of this course, please look at course content (above) . 

 

 

Teaching/learning method(s)

Lecture-part, part (A) of this course: 

(unsurprisingly) lectures;

there exists a lecture-manuscript as text in Learn, slides + MC/SC questions with automated feedback; to make sure that we all are "on board", there are weekly assignments (in groups), and weekly MC/SC tests (in groups, + don't worry you can do them in a certain time period twice), (plenty of) literature (primary and secondary) is made available in Learn,

Uebungs/Discussion part, (part B) of this course: 

reading of papers, analysis, discussion of conclusions, questions and/or problems; world-café.

to avoid any further redundancy about time periods of parts (A) and (B) see class structure/content above; 

Assessment

Please study the requirements and the assessment information carefully :

1. Final MC/SC-test: 30 questions (30 minutes): max. points: 60. (20 points have to be reached in order for this part to count as positive). 

2. weekly assignments: 4 weekly assignments — in groups (max 5), 5 questions, 3 max points for every question, 15 max points for every assignment, in total, for 5 x 4 assignments = 60 points. Points are given on an all or nothing principle: 7 - 15 points = 15 points  0 - 6 points = 0 points. 2 weekly assignments have to be positive. Assignment 2: 15 points for every group. Assignment 4: will not be graded according to the all-or-nothing rule.

ATTENTION: There are weekly deadlines (see Learn) : assignments have to be uploaded at time. assignments that are sent to Ms. Gerdenich or me because they cannot be uploaded anymore will not be graded. I am sorry: since this is a course of 260 students, assignments can also not turned in a second time. 

3. weekly MC/SC test as another part of the weekly assignment: 5 (!) MC/SC tests in the same groups as the assignment groups (max 5) , every test = 5 points, total 25 points. Points are given on an all or nothing principle: 0 - 60% = 0 points, 61 - 100 % = 5 points. 3 MC tests have to be turned in/have to be positive for this part to count as positive (15 points minimum). 

4. contribution in discussion sessions + short group presentation and short paper (groups of max 10),  max point: 55 ( 30 points have to be reached in order for this assessment part to count as positive) 

5. Short paper/handout (55 points), deadline: May 24, 23:55.

*+ points: answering questions of your colleagues in the “foren”: max 1, 5 points (0, 5 point for answering a question of a colleague of yours).

 The final MC test, the weekly MC tests, the short paper have to be positive. So please, spend some time on these required parts (weekly MC tests, final MC test, paper presentation) of this course. What are the min. points needed for every assessment part of this course? - see above. 

Points in total: 200

182 - 200:      very good (1)

162 - 180:      good (2) 

140 - 160:      satisfactory (3) 

110 - 138:      sufficient (4) 

below 110:     fail (5)

180, 5 181, 181, 5 points will be treated as „in-between“-grades  (as 160, 5 etc.) with the possibility to get a higher grade by adding points from your contribution to “foren”- discussions (f.e. answering questions of your colleagues in the “foren”: see above. So if you had in total 181, 5 points and if you had answered 1 questions in the foren, you would receive a 1 as final grade.

 

Prerequisites for participation and waiting lists

Progress in your studies. 

Readings
1
Title:

The lecture text in Learn-WU


Content relevant for class examination: Yes
Recommendation: Essential reading for all students
Recommended previous knowledge and skills

Knowledge in critical thinking, logic and philosophy is welcomed but not required.

You might feel not really familiar with the level of generality needed in thinking about “logic and methodology” at first — just give it a while to “sink in”. 

Availability of lecturer(s)

For all questions and problems concerning Learn and the structure of the course please only contact: Maximilian Margreiter: maximilian.margreiter@wu.ac.at

Per email: gabriele.mras@wu.ac.at

per phone: my phone number is: 31336-4257

and in the lecture & discussion hour(s) for this course: via Zoom. 

In case you can’t reach me, please contact: Ms. Bettina Gerdenich: bettina.gerdenich@wu.ac.at

Stefan Riegelnik’s email address from March 2021 on is stefan.riegelnik@wu.ac.at

 

 

 

 

 

Other

Please make yourself familiar with LearnWU:

What is the lecture part (A), What is UE part (B): see description in the syllabus: "course-content" + description of single sessions. What is the attendance requirement for the lecture part (A), What is the attendance requirement for UE part (B): see description in the syllabus "attendance requirement"  for lecture part (a) and UE part (B).

Where are the"To Dos"(Assignments/MC tests), when are the deadlines? see Learn "Assignments"

What is the max. group-size for the assignments? 5 - for part A's assignments; 10 for part B presentations . If you don't tell us your preferences (i.e. with whom you want to be together), we will put you in a group (unless you explicitly want to work on your own, if so,  please contact me by email). 

How can I answer the "To Dos"(Assignments): see Learn "Part A, PhilOfScience Lecture Texts 1-5" (should be enough), there are also slides ... and certainly the "recommended literature" (uploaded). ATTENTION:  After the deadline no assignment will be accepted. The assignments are answerable on the basis of the lecture texts in Learn, the slides in Learn.

How much of the literature has to be read in oder to be able to answer the assignment-questions? The idea (and my hope) is that the lecture texts + slides are enough to understand the topics and enough in order to be able to answer the assignments and the MC test. -- on the basis that you have read/ had a look into the "recommended" literature. It is not expected that you study all the uploaded literature. The additional literature is mainly secondary literature and chosen because of its value for further study. Please, do not "google around"(sometimes WIKIPEDIA for example is very good, sometimes it is too superficial, and sometimes just not correct). 

How can I get help for the weekly MC Test? see "Part A, PhilOfScience Lecture Texts 1-5" there are Part A MC questions  with automated feedback. ... ATTENTION:  After the deadlines no MC TEST/assignment will be accepted. 

What are the assessment criteria? Information about assessment criteria, etc can be found in Learn/the syllabus

How will the final MC/SC test be organized? It will be supervised by WU ZID and you have to give us your consent ... for video supervision etc you must not forget to verify your ID days before the exam etc.. (We will send an info email 1 week before). In case of proven internet connection problems, there will be a 2nd date for the exam. 

What if you miss the MC Test in April? — There will be a 2nd date for this Test: in the last week of June (DistanceLearning will inform us, but not before the middle of May).

What about grades, points etc... ? see "assessment criteria". Information about assessment criteria, etc can be found in Learn/the syllabus. Discussion about points for weekly assignments + the short paper presentation at the end of this course only

Whom can I ask, if I have questions, problems ... ? Me, my colleague from the UZH, Dr. Stefan Riegelnik + my colleague from WU, Maximilian Margreiter. I will have something like "office hours" on Tuesdays from 12:00 - 12:45.: on MS Teams or Zoom. 

 

ECTS Points — Work Load

This course has 6 ECTS points.

The workload for this course is therefore ca. 150 hours. If one substracts 30 hours for the preparation for the 1/2 hour MC exam (I don’t think that you will need that much time, however), there are 120 hours left.

This means that you should reserve roughly 90 hours as workload for the part A (exam preparation excluded) for listening to the audios, reading the lecture-texts, and the literature, answering the weekly assignments of part A; so roughly 15 hours per week (the course will end by the end of May). 

Unit details
Unit Date Contents
1 09.03.2021: 12:00-14:30

1. “Scientific Reasoning in Antiquity: Aristotle‘s Logic, the Stoa, and the School of Baghdad“ (Lecture)

Required Readings:

  • Lecture-text in LearnWU

Recommended Readings:

Additional:

Info:

  • Aristotle and Plato  in: "History of Ideas"
2 16.03.2021: 12:00-14:30

2. „The Middle Ages and the ‚Scientific Revolution‘ — Scholasticism and the search for a method in the empirical sciences“ (Lecture) 

Required Readings:

  • Lecture-text in LearnWU

Recommended Readings:

Additional:

Info:

  • Biography Galileo Galilei
  • Bacon, Kepler, Kopernikus and Galileo Galilei in: "History of Ideas"
  • Observing Facts in: "Question about the objectivity observation and its reliability"
3 23.03.2021: 12:00-14:30

3. Philosophy and science or the question of the presuppositions of all empirical observation (Lecture)

Required Readings:

  • Lecture-text in LearnWU

Recommended Readings:

Additional:

Info:

  • Hume and Kant in: "History of Ideas"
4 13.04.2021: 12:00-14:30

4. „a. Immanuel Kant & reactions to the problem of induction in the 19th century; b.  development of the a ‚new‘ mathematical logic“ (Lecture)

Required Readings:

  • Lecture-text in LearnWU

Difficult but Interesting Readings:

 

  • Kant, I.: Introduction; in: Critique of Pure Reason, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1922, p.1-12.
  • Boole G.: The Mathematical Analysis of Logic. Being an Essay towards a calculus of deductive reasoning, Philosophical Library New York, Cambridge 1847, p. 1-25.
  • Frege, G. § 1-11; in: Angelelli, I.:  Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze Zweite Auflage mit E. Husserls und H. Scholz Anmerkungen, Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Georg Olms Verlag 2014, p. 1-19.
  • Carnap, R.What is Logical Analysis of Science? in: Hanfling, O. (ed.): Essential Readings in Logical Positivism; Oxford 1981, p. 112-129.

Additional:

5 20.04.2021: 12:00-14:30

5. „Theories of confirmation in the 20th century and the question of the reducibility of all sciences to the natural sciences“ (Lecture) 

  • Lecture-text in LearnWU

Recommended Readings:

Additional:

  • Delanty, G; Strydom, P.. (eds.): Philosophies of Social Science. The Classic and Contemporary Readings, Chap. 2., 6. und 14.; Maidenhead, Philadelphia: Open University Press 2003

Info:

  • Carnap and Popper in: "History of Ideas"
6 23.04.2021: 16:00-20:00

Übung (Gabriele M. Mras)

1. 16:00-18:00 (LV 5670/LV 5671)

2. 18:00-20:00 (LV 5980/LV 5981)

7 28.04.2021: 12:00-13:00

Final MC test multiple-choice-test — video supervision.
If you cannot take part, we need an official justification why not. 

There will be a second date for the MC test in the last week of June (DistanceLearning will inform us when exactly in late May — as soon as we know we will post it here). 

8 11.05.2021:

Application Questions (Stefan Riegelnik)

On the very idea of social sciences – On the ontological status of social entities

Required Readings:

Additional Readings:

 

    9 11.05.2021

    Background Readings:

    10 18.05.2021:

    Application Questions (Stefan Riegelnik)

    Critical theory vs. critical rationalism – the so called "positivism Dispute" – a brief history and introduction.

    Required Readings:

    11 25.05.2021:

    Paper/handout presentation in form of a “world café”

    Paper topics will be assigned by e-mail.

    Topics are:

    1. The idea of a social science (cf. Rosenberg)
    2. Laws and cause in the social sciences (cf. Kincaid, Rosenberg)
    3. The ontology of the social (cf. Searle)
    4. Positivism dispute from the point of view of Popper (cf. Popper)
    5. Positivism dispute from the point of view of Adorno and Horkheimer (cf. Adorno/Horkheimer)
    6. On the very idea of a critical theory (cf. Geuss)
    7. The individualism-holism debate in the social sciences (cf. Hoover)

    We are looking forward to your presentations!

    Last edited: 2021-05-05



    Back