Syllabus

Title
1196 Elective - Leading Complex Organizations
Instructors
Univ.Prof. Dr. Barbara Schachermayer-Sporn
Type
PI
Weekly hours
2
Language of instruction
Englisch
Registration
09/09/24 to 09/20/24
Registration via LPIS
Notes to the course
Dates
Day Date Time Room
Thursday 10/31/24 09:00 AM - 11:00 AM D5.1.004
Thursday 11/14/24 09:00 AM - 01:00 PM D5.1.004
Thursday 11/21/24 09:00 AM - 01:00 PM D5.1.004
Thursday 11/28/24 09:00 AM - 01:00 PM D5.1.004
Thursday 12/05/24 09:00 AM - 01:00 PM D5.1.004
Thursday 12/12/24 09:00 AM - 01:00 PM D5.1.004
Contents

In this course, students will learn and reflect about the management of complex organizations that are part of today’s world of work. Universities will serve as the prime example of complex organizations and students will learn to apply and transfer theories and concepts of leadership from the business world to higher education institutions. Universities are excellent examples given their complexity (e.g., volatile environment, many stakeholders, vulnerability to legal regulations, multiple goals, expert organization, unclear technology) to demonstrate the different challenges when it comes to developing an efficient and effective organization and strategy. More than a decade of work experience of the instructor as a Vice-Rector at WU Vienna University of Economics and Business will be added to the course experience.

Drawing on a variety of higher education and business literature, we will examine major areas: organization & governance, institutional environment & markets, leadership, strategy, and change. Class sessions will be complemented by guest lectures from international universities leaders and experts.

Students are asked to participate actively in this course. Student presentations, prepared questions based on a real-life case, a background paper, and discussions in groups as well as video analysis are the major learning formats. Personal experiences as students in different universities can serve as a starting point for individual and group reflections. Different national systems provide an additional comparative perspective.

In this respect, students will gain insights in the complex nature of university organization, e.g., stakeholders in decision-making, administrative and academic structures, influence of external constituencies, environmental demands. The discussion will focus on differences between the profit and the non-profit-sector. After completing the course, students should be able to understand and analyze complex organizations and to assess the suitability of different leadership approaches. This will enable them to apply their learning in different organizational settings of the profit and nonprofit world.

Learning outcomes

· Understanding key aspects of leadership in complex organizational settings

· Applying insights to university settings based on individual case

· Dealing with complex problems by applying theory to case institutions by working through recent literature

Attendance requirements

Full attendance in all sessions is mandatory.

Teaching/learning method(s)

The course consists of one introductory session, and five regular units. The introductory meeting will outline the major features of the course and the assignments

Unit 2-6 are dedicated to discussing certain topics in more detail. Each session will have the following format:

· General outline of the topic

· Student group presentations

· Group work, case discussion or guest lectures

Assessment

In addition to presenting and discussing research and practice on leadership of complex organizations, the course aims to develop your skills in writing, critical reading and thinking. To these ends, assessment (i.e., grades) will be based upon completion of the following assignments:

1. Class Participation (50%)

A general requirement of the course is the completion of all assigned readings for each class session. For this, you are asked for active participation in class discussion. You should prepare comments and questions for each class. Students will also present in class in which they introduce the topic and one reading to the class and guide the discussion. The aim is to refine your skills in doing and presenting a critical analysis.

Hence, the assessment for this part includes:

o Preparing synthesis of readings applied to YOUR university (20%)

o Group Presentation of reading in class and leading discussion (30%)

2. Paper (40%)

Use YOUR university and pick the major challenge you would like to address. Use the literature of the course and additional sources. Length is limited to maximum 15 pages including all materials.

The paper is due on January 15 on CANVAS. Coaching for the paper can be arranged with the course instructor individually.

3. Reflection and assessment paper (10%)

A written self-assessment of your role as learner and contributor to the class, including the extent to which you engaged in completing the above assignments. Additionally, this statement should include an evaluation of the role of content, form and instructor in completing the tasks. The assessment (not more than 3 pages) is due together with the research paper on January 15 on CANVAS.

Readings

Please log in with your WU account to use all functionalities of read!t. For off-campus access to our licensed electronic resources, remember to activate your VPN connection connection. In case you encounter any technical problems or have questions regarding read!t, please feel free to contact the library at readinglists@wu.ac.at.

Availability of lecturer(s)

For further questions, please contact Professor Sporn via email at sporn@wu.ac.at.

 

Tutor

·        Available for student support during the course

·        Yi Pan, available at yi.pan@wu.ac.at

Other

Readings

All course related readings are available on CANVAS.

For further questions, please contact the tutor for assistance.

Please for formatting your paper use Bachelor/Master Thesis Guide on www.wu.ac.at/ihm

Use of AI

Your paper should be your original work and you should declare the use of AI. Misusing text generated by AI tools, such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, Bard, or others, is not considered original work. It is considered academic misconduct under our policy, leading to serious disciplinary actions.  The automated plagiarism check of your paper will return a probability score for AI generated text.

While the core should be your own creation, you are allowed to use AI-based tools for grammar checks and writing revisions. However, you are not allowed to use AI-based software to generate new text for your paper, for example, by using prompts like "write a paragraph about my topic" or "make this section longer." If you choose to use AI-based tools, please ensure that you provide a detailed overview in the appendix, including your prompts and the responses from the text generation software that you used to generate your paper. To assist you with this, we provided a reporting text template below.

Text Template for Reporting the Use of AI Tools:

Acknowledgment of Artificial Intelligence Tools Used:

For purposes of writing revision and grammar checks, I used the following tools:

Gramarly (https://www.grammarly.com)

Chat-GPT v.3.5 (https://chat.openai.com/)

Bing (https://www.bing.com)

 

I used the following promts:

"Check for errors in my writing"

"Correct for grammar, spelling and comma mistakes."

 

I used the output to help revise my writing in the following segments of my thesis:

1.1. Introduction

2.3. Sampling

3.4.2. Results Study 1

4. Discussion

Unit details
Unit Date Contents
1 31.10.

Introduction to the course

 

Content

· Introduction of instructor and students

· Course content and organization

· Explain assignments and assessment

Presentation to warm up: Context for the Course

  • Present YOUR university "Key features, key challenges"
  • Upload 1 slide on Canvas on October 30, 12 noon
  • EUA Universities of the Future

https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/universities%20without%20walls%20%20a%20vision%20for%202030.pdf

Prepare and discuss individual impressions based on YOUR university selection. Come back to it in Unit 3!

2 14.11.

Organization & Governance

Guiding Question

· What are the characteristics of complex organizations like universities?

 

Content

Presentation

Knowing your institution: organization and decision-making in universities

 

Presentation and Discussion by Students

Readings

  1. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative science quarterly, 1-19.
  2. Musselin, C. (2007). Are universities specific organisations. Towards a multiversity, 63-84.
  3. Morphew, C. C., Fumasoli, T., & Stensaker, B. (2018). Changing missions? How the strategic plans of research-intensive universities in Northern Europe and North America balance competing identities. Studies in Higher Education, 43(6), 1074-1088.

 

Guest Lecture: The Challenges of Governance and Organization in large public universities: experiences of a Vice-Rector and Higher Education Research

Professor Björn Stensaker, Vice-Rector Education, University of Oslo

3 21.11.

Leadership

Guiding Questions

· What are the challenges of leading complex organizations?

· Which stakeholders are key in effective leadership?

 

Content

Presentation

Leading your institution: complexity, environment, diversity

 

Presentation and Discussion by Students

Readings

  1. Doyle, T., & Brady, M. (2018). Reframing the university as an emergent organisation: implications for strategic management and leadership in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40(4), 305-320.
  2. Freund, M. (2017). Shared leadership: Research and implications for nonprofit leadership, capacity building, and education. The Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership7(1).
  3. Leih, S., & Teece, D. (2016). Campus leadership and the entrepreneurial university: A dynamic capabilities perspective. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2), 182-210.

Guest Lecture: Leading Complex Organizations and Systems: Experiences from Portugal

Professor Pedro Teixeira, Professor of Economics and Former Vice-Rector, University of Porto, Former State Secretary for Education, Portugal

 

Refer back to Unit 1 reading

4 28.11.

Strategy

Guiding Question: How does Strategy formation in a university setting work?

Content

Presentation

Strategy in Complex Organizations

 

Presentation and Discussion by Students

Readings

  1. Holstein, J., Starkey, K., & Wright, M. (2016). Strategy and narrative in higher education. Strategic Organization, 1476127016674877.
  2. Hayter, C.S., & Cahoy, D.R. (2018). Toward a strategic view of higher education social responsibilities: A dynamic capabilities approach. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 12-34.
  3. Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., & Lepori, B. (2015). Organizations as penetrated hierarchies: Environmental pressures and control in professional organizations. Organization Studies, 36(7), 873-896.

Guest Intervention: Challenges of Universities around the Globe: Strategies of Response, Discussion with Professor Marijk van der Wende, Professor of Higher Education at Utrecht University (TBC)

5 05.12.

Environment for Colleges and Universities: Comparison US-EU

Guiding Questions:

  • How do markets influence complex organizations?
  • What trends can be observed in the EU and US?

Content

Presentation: Features of the US System and EU planning

Reading: Marginsin, S. (2022). What drives global science? The four competing narratives. Studies in higher education, 47(8), 1566-1584

Film Viewing: The Ivory Tower

Group Discussion:

  • What are the major trends?
  • What are the parallels to your own context?
  • Where do you see opportunities and threats of the US system in comparison to your own?
6 12.12.

Change

Guiding Question: Which factors influence change in complex organizations?

Content

Presentation

Leading change in institutions

 

Presentation and Discussion by Students

Readings

  1. Bruckmann, S., & Carvalho, T. (2018). Understanding change in higher education: An archetypal approach. Higher Education, 76(4), 629-647.
  2. Kezar, A. (2014). Higher education change and social networks: A review of research. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(1), 91-125.
  3. Gornitzka, Å., Maassen, P., & De Boer, H. (2017). Change in university governance structures in continental Europe. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(3), 274-289.

Group Work: Images of the University of the Future

Presentation and Discussion

Course Wrap-up

Last edited: 2024-10-10



Back